Concerning Periodic Inspection Reporting for a housing group, shower zones and which Code to issue, this Q & A of the Day is answered by experts from Voltimum UK Partner organisation – the NICEIC (Theme – Electrical Testing):
My interpretation of this is whatever the problem, it requires improvement but is safe to leave in service (knowing that the work will be carried out in next year's budget - eg: a shower in Zone 1 and no RCD protection).
My QS is saying that this is a Code 4, but Code 4 work does not come in to the budget as it complied at the time of installation. We can still make out the certificate as being 'unsatisfactory', but my concern is that Code 4 work will not be bought up to date, as they are only going to issue a Code 2.
Another regular concern is that of gas/water bonding only in 6mm. I would put this as a Code 2. He says that it is a Code 4. I know that this arrangement does not comply, but what is the point in having a Code 2 when everything is going to be a Code 4...other than major defects that are Code 1?
I wrote that further inspection is due in 12 months. Can you clearly define a Code 2 in this situation? Also, where should a Code 4 should be used?
Answer: As indicated, a Periodic Inspection Report (PIR) must accurately reflect the electrical condition of the installation for its continued use. This report cannot be re-adjusted just to get Code 4 deviations improved.
A Code 1 or 2 must be addressed in a swift period of time because there is either an immediate or potential risk of electrical safety. A shower with no RCD is not a Code 1 or 2 unless there is no supplementary bonding within the installation.
Your professional opinion is relied upon to confirm whether the installation is safe for its continued use and whether the installation does comply with BS7671:2008 - do not get those two confused.
To see many more Q & A in Voltimum UK's Experts Area, please click on the link:
www.voltimum.co.uk/consult.php?universe=consult.index.questions