telemecanique catalogue, led, lumilux, ipx4, how to calculate kva, wiring diagram star delta, voltage drop calculator, how-to calculate cable size, convert kva into amps, cable sizing program calculator
Login
Register now!
home button  / News & Events
Manufacturers News
Industry News
Trade Association and Industry Body News
Wholesalers News
Voltimum Newsletters
Voltimum Out and About
Voltimum Winners
A Cuppa With...
On My Desk
Speaker's Corner
Product of the Month
TV News Report
Special Events

Q & A of the Day - Main equipotential bonding and plastic services – is bonding required?

BookmarkThis 04.04.2008
SELECT
 

Our Voltimum Experts answer your questions on a daily basis in our Technical Expertise area. This one, concerning main equipotential bonding and plastic services, and whether bonding is required, is answered by SELECT:

To bond or not?
To bond or not?
pixel
Question: Looking back through the archive questions (28/08/2007), I was interested to read two conflicting answers to a question about whether or not main equipotential bonding is required where there is a plastic water service pipe connecting at the stop-cock, to copper internal pipe-work, within an installation.

The question was answered 'yes' - it is required, by the ECA, but 'no' by the NICEIC; the latter confirming the original questioner's reasoning that it did not introduce an earth potential and to main bond the internal copper pipe work of a property would actually introduce a hazard.

Which is correct answer?

Answer: Generally, main water services today are of an alkathene type and, where internal plastic type pipework is also installed, there will be no necessity to provide main equipotential bonding to these services, as there would be no conductive parts likely to introduce a potential.

Where internal copper pipework is installed throughout a building, then this pipework may be in touch with earth at some point in the installation and would therefore be considered to be an extraneous conductive part which would therefore require to be main bonded.

This is where differences of opinion may occur - i.e. as to whether metal pipework is considered to be an extraneous conductive part or not. If the designer considers that metal parts are not extraneous conductive parts, then there would be no requirement to main bond. Such an example might be a metal window frame which is not likely to introduce a potential and therefore not present a hazard.

For further information, IEE Guidance Note 8 on earthing and bonding should be consulted.

To see many more Q & A in Voltimum UK's Experts Area, please click on the link:

http://www.voltimum.co.uk/consult.php?universe=consult.index.questions

 Back

 Related contacts
SELECT
The Walled Garden, Bush Estate,
Midlothian, Scotland EH26 0SB
Tel: 0131 445 5577
Fax: 0131 445 5548
Email: admin@select.org.uk
Web: www.select.org.uk
blue arrow pointing right   SELECT

 For latest electrical industry news, register for Voltimum's free newsletter.
Enter your email address here:
OK

Source: SELECT & James Hunt

Related information

Related contacts

More News...

Q & A of the Day – Can I wire to a pillar drill this way?
Q & A of the Day – Do we need to bond the metal studs in partition walls?
Q & A of the Day – Do I need earthing tails from back boxes?
Q & A of the Day – How high should a consumer unit be?
Q & A of the Day – What is entered in ‘schedule of items inspected’?
Q & A of the Day - Requirements for a paint store – explosion-proof?
Q & A of the Day – Guidance Note 1 - are there de-rating factors regarding cable?
Q & A of the Day - Cable routing